Federal drug laws develop a labeling issue. When you hear the term "drug trafficker," you may think about Pablo Escobar or Walter White, but the truth is that under federal law, drug traffickers include people who buy pseudo-ephedrine for their methamphetamine dealer; serve as intermediary in a series of little transactions; or perhaps pick up a travel suitcase for the wrong pal. Thanks to conspiracy laws, everybody on the totem pole can be based on the very same serious compulsory minimum sentences.
To the men and ladies who prepared our federal drug laws in 1986, this might come as a surprise. According to Sen. Robert Byrd, cosponsor of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, the reason to attach 5- and ten-year compulsory sentences to drug trafficking was to punish "the kingpins-- the masterminds who are really running these operations", and the mid-level dealerships.
Fast forward twenty-five years. Today, almost everyone convicted of a federal drug criminal offense is founded guilty of "drug trafficking", which more often than not results in at least a 5- or ten-year compulsory jail sentence. That's a lot of time in federal prison for lots of people who are minor parts of drug trade, the large bulk of whom are males and females of color.
This is the system that federal district Judge Mark Bennett sees every day. Judge Bennett sits on the district court in northern Iowa, and he deals with a lot of drug cases. "Never might I have actually envisioned," he writes in a recent piece in The Nation, "that ... after nineteen years [as a federal district court judge], I would have sent 1,092 of my fellow citizens to federal prison for compulsory minimum sentences varying from sixty months to life without the possibility of release. Most of these females, men and young adults are nonviolent drug abuser." What about the kingpins? "I can count them on one hand," he states.
The numbers can't convey the unreasonable catastrophe of everything. This is how he explains a recent drug trafficking case:
I just recently sentenced a group of more than twenty accused on meth trafficking conspiracy charges. Eighteen were 'tablet smurfers,' as federal district attorneys put it, indicating their function https://www.criminallawyerslasvegas.com/drug-conspiracy-defense-las-vegas/ amounted to frequently purchasing and providing cold medicine to meth cookers in exchange for extremely small, low-grade quantities to feed their severe dependencies. All of them faced mandatory minimum sentences of sixty or 120 months.
They discovered that in 2005, the majority of the lowest-level drug- and crack-trafficking offenders-- men and females described as "street-level dealerships", "couriers/mules", and "renter/loader/lookout/ enabler/users"-- received 5- or ten-year obligatory jail sentences. This is specifically real for crack-cocaine defendants, many of whom are black; despite the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, offering a small amount of fracture cocaine (28 grams) brings the same compulsory minimum sentence-- five years-- as offering 500 grams of powder cocaine.
This is the truth for which supporters of serious federal drug laws need to account. We should confess that our sentencing of minor individuals in the drug trade to jail terms meant for the leaders of large drug companies-- as a common incident, not as an exception.
If lengthy mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug user really worked, one might be able to rationalize them. But there is no proof that they do. I have seen how they leave numerous thousands of kids parent-less and thousands of aging, infirm and passing away parents childless. They destroy households and mightily fuel the cycle of hardship and dependency.
Here, once again, we have evidence that Judge Bennett is right: long obligatory sentences are unneeded for the majority of drug offenders. In 2002 and 2003, Michigan and New York reversed necessary sentences for drug transgressors and gave judges the power to impose shorter sentences, probation, or drug treatment.
He has actually seen mandatory laws written for the most serious, large-scale drug dealers used to the guys and females on the least expensive rungs of the drug trade, and he has actually seen it take place a lot. We as soon as envisioned that severe mandatory sentences would be used to deal with the leaders of large drug operations.
If you have been charged with a drug related offense and need qualified representation, contact us to discuss your case.
Contact:
Mace Yampolsky & Associates
625 S 6th St.
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 385-9777